TRUTHESTATE
Compare/BPTP Downtown-66 vs TARC Ishva

Project comparison

BPTP Downtown-66 vs TARC Ishva

Our read

BPTP Downtown-66 leads on our score (69 vs 64). TARC Ishva still earns its place on legal safety.

BPTP Downtown-66

Sector 66, GCE Corridor, Gurugram

69/100 Truth Score
WatchlistMinor Delay
Full forensic report
TARC Ishva

Sector 63A, GCE Corridor, Gurugram

64/100 Truth Score
High RiskMinor Delay
Full forensic report

Ticket

₹5–5.9 Cr
₹6.6–8.9 Cr

Developer

BPTP
TARC Limited

Corridor

GCE
GCE
Vitals' comparison

Total units

504
518

Towers

3
5

Floors

G+45 Floors
G+37

Land

4.2 acre
7 acre

Density

119 / acre
75 / acre

Open area

0%
88%Green

Possession

est. Apr 2033
est. May 2032
The homes

Configurations

3 BHK · 4 BHK
3 BHK · 4 BHK

Super area

2,500–2,950 sq ft
2,858–3,883 sq ft

Carpet efficiency

51–52%

carpet ÷ super, across 2 layouts

56%▲

carpet ÷ super, across 3 layouts

The money

Price today

₹21.5K mid
₹24K mid

from ₹20.5K at launch

Premium since launch

—
+17%

since Sep 2024

Free · no card

See which one is the better buy

Unlock the ROI head-to-head, all five pillars, and every watch-out — with a number.

or

Buyer-side only — no broker calls, no spam. The project reads stay open to you.

The build

Delivery forecast

Minor Delay (1–6 mo)

3.0 mo behind RERA

Minor Delay (1–6 mo)

3.0 mo behind RERA

Built vs RERA-due

Expected OC

Units sold

Escrow solvency (CFCR)

Inventory overhang

Trust, pillar by pillar

The same five-pillar model that builds the Truth Score — weighted 28 · 22 · 22 · 18 · 10.

Developer DNA

6.4/10▲
5.8/10

Still deciding between the two?

An independent advisor can weigh them against your exact budget, horizon and priorities.

Independent comparison by Truth Estate. No developer can pay for a higher score or a better placement. Scores, signals and bands are our own evidence-based reads and vary by tower, floor and stack — not investment advice.