Truth Estate · Forensic Delivery Audit · August 2026
72% of Gurugram’s new-launch homes are running late.
We ran a forensic delivery audit on every under-construction project we track — reading each RERA filing against live construction progress. Three in four are on course to hand over after the date the builder committed to.
How we know this — and why you can check it
Sourced from filings
Every figure is read from HARERA registrations and the quarterly construction-progress reports developers file by law.
Our data sourcesIndependent
No developer pays for placement, and no ranking here can be bought. We take no ads, no listing fees, no commissions.
Verify it yourself
Every named project below links to its own public HARERA registration. Don’t take our word — open the filing.
Jump to the projectsOn the record
We publish our verdicts and keep score against what actually happens — the calls we got right and the ones we didn’t.
See the recordpredicted to deliver later than the RERA-committed date
91 of 126
carry a 70%+ chance of delay on our model
57 of 117
the minority on course to deliver on time or early
35 of 126
projects our model flags as 2+ years behind
23 more are 1+ year late
Source: 146projects’ HARERA registrations read against their latest quarterly construction-progress filings. “Late” = execution-adjusted estimate lands after the RERA-committed possession date.
Delay risk is a corridor story
Average modelled chance-of-delay, by corridor. The established, land-locked corridors carry the most timeline risk; the newer master-planned belts fare better — but none is clean.
Source: modelled chance-of-delay per project, from HARERA filings vs quarterly progress, averaged by corridor. Corridors with fewer than 3 tracked projects are omitted; averages are simple means.
The developers with the weakest delivery records
Share of each developer’s tracked Gurugram projects that have run past their committed date, from their RERA filings. Developers with at least three tracked projects. No one pays to move up or down this list.
The other side of the ledger — the strongest tracked records: Conscient (0%), Elan (0%), L&T Realty (10%).
Source: each developer’s Gurugram project registrations on the HARERA registry, scored on committed vs actual/estimated handover. Each firm links to its full record, project by project.
The projects at the highest delivery risk
Our model’s highest chance-of-delay reads. The exact execution-adjusted forecast, the evidence and the full verdict are in each project’s report.
Each project’s RERA registration number links to its official HARERA filing — open it and check the committed possession date and progress against ours.
How we measured it
For each project we compare the RERA-committed possession date against a delivery estimate built from the latest quarterly construction-progress filing — actual build percentage versus where the schedule says it should be. A project counts as “late” when the execution-adjusted estimate lands after the committed date. No developer can pay to change a figure here. The full method is in our methodology. These are tracked and modelled estimates, not guarantees.
Gurugram delivery delays — the questions buyers ask
Are Gurugram's new-launch projects actually running late?
Yes. In our forensic audit of 146 under-construction Gurugram projects, 72% are on course to be handed over after the possession date the builder committed to in its RERA filing. 6 are modelled 2+ years behind, and 23 more are at least a year late.
How does Truth Estate measure whether a project will be delivered late?
For each project we compare the RERA-committed possession date against a delivery estimate built from the latest quarterly construction-progress filing — actual build percentage versus where the schedule says it should be. A project counts as late when the execution-adjusted estimate lands after the committed date. No developer can pay to change a figure.
Which Gurugram corridors have the highest delivery-delay risk?
Golf Course Rd (80% average modelled chance of delay), Sohna (68% average modelled chance of delay), Sohna Road (58% average modelled chance of delay) carry the most timeline risk among the corridors we track. SPR fares best among the larger corridors, at 49%. Even the strongest corridor is not clean.
Which developers have the weakest delivery records in Gurugram?
We rank developers by the share of their tracked Gurugram projects that ran past the committed date, from their RERA filings. On our current data Birla Estates carries the weakest tracked record among developers with at least three projects. The full, named league table — worst and best — is on the audit page, and each developer links to its own record.
Can I verify a project's delay risk myself?
Yes. Every named project on the audit shows its HARERA registration number and links straight to the public filing, so you can check the committed possession date and construction progress against ours. The exact execution-adjusted forecast for a specific project is in that project's report.
Is this delivery audit independent, or do developers pay to be included?
It is independent. Truth Estate takes no money from developers — no ads, no listing fees, no commissions — so no builder can pay to move up or off any list. Every figure traces to a public HARERA filing.
Is the home you’re eyeing on time?
We’ve audited the delivery risk, legal standing and true pricing of every project here. Check the one you’re considering before you book.
Find your project’s report →Figures from Truth Estate’s forensic audit of 146tracked Gurugram under-construction projects, August 2026. Delay risk = modelled chance-of-delay from RERA-committed dates versus quarterly construction progress. Developer records are the share of each firm’s tracked projects past their committed date, from RERA filings. Tracked and modelled estimates — not guarantees, and not investment, legal or financial advice.